Studies forever, are sometimes cheaper and more politically convenient than action or technically serious work. For example, there is a common and political perception that new reservoirs are needed. Most elected and business officials grew up in an era when if you needed more water, you went to the nearest watershed, built a dam, and diverted water to where you wanted it. Today, most of the technical community is lukewarm on the idea of expanding reservoirs, for economic, technical, and environmental reasons. Constructing new reservoirs also taps an immense reserve of controversy. So consider the choices:
A) Build a reservoir costing $2 billion, or $100 million/year for a long time at 5% annual interest
B) Study building a reservoir, costing $1 million/year, perhaps for a very long time
B) Study building a reservoir, costing $1 million/year, perhaps for a very long time
The least controversial and most politic and economical choice here is to study the problem for a long time and rarely release substantial reports on the subject. This neatly dampens most of the controversy, while keeping agencies and consultants well funded and out of trouble. However, studying the problem forever has a financial cost, and arguably greater costs from dissipating analytical expertise, avoiding more serious discussions, and loss of technical integrity in government agencies.
So much of Orange County politics is driven by the engineering and construction community.
ReplyDeleteNo, take that back a few steps and look at who bankrolls development. Often it is the cities at the request of developers. Look at the 6-story monster on tomorrow's Council agenda. It is to be financed by you and I through municipal bonds via the California Municipal Finance Authority - another joint-powers authority for our City Council to join, thereby making us Fullerton taxpayers beholden to the municipal co-op. The developer has almost no risk while the taxpayers get left with the bill.
ReplyDeleteSadly it is a minority of people and companies that drive taxes, development, and politics.