Click HERE and view page 16 of St. Anton Partners' "winning" proposal where they list Nossaman.
Dick Ackerman is also spearheading "Protect Fullerton - Recall No" on behalf of those same council members who just voted for his client's big ($9.5-million) contract. (see image at left)
Any one who thought Mayor Jones, Mayor Pro Tem Bankhead, and Council Member McKinley were going to live up to their "transparent and open government" platform are sorely mistaken.
Jones, Bankhead, and McKinley have nothing to offer Fullerton but more law suits, failed policies, and a legacy of corruption.
Image borrowed from FullertonsFuture.org and blogger "Nipsey" |
If I am to believe your info is accurate, this contract to be awarded by the City Councilmen is unconscionable and presents a clear conflict of interest. As a new resident to Fullerton, I'm quickly learning that this town has been run this way for decades and in order to foster a culture of complete transparency and one that puts the interests of the citizens of Fullerton before their own, there will have to be change. Unfortunately it appears the these public servants think they are immune to having to qualify what are clear ethical issues. Their qid pro quo buddy-buddy system is antiquated and certainly sheds a new light on the phrase power corrupts. S
ReplyDeleteYou can read the minutes of the council meeting at http://www.cityoffullerton.com/about/meetings_live.asp#bodyTop at item 24.
ReplyDelete"Bankhead moved, seconded by McKinley, to support the proposal of St. Anton Partners...Motion carried 3-2. (Opposed: Whitaker, Quirk-Silva)"
Despite the fact that the ST. Anton Partners project was ranked 6th (30.53 points out of 40 points possible), Bankhead, Mckinley and Jones still gave them our tax dollars!
And as you can see by the event flyer above, Dick Ackerman is now leading the anti-recall campaign.
None of this reflects a transparent government, but the facts - if you dig far enough - are there.