After putting a spot light on what the Howard Jarvis Taxpayer's Association has characterized as an illegal water tax and then discovering rampant misappropriations of earmarked funds, its frustrating to learn that City Manager Joe Felz is up for a raise.
According to the August 16, 2011 City Council agenda and associated staff report, Felz will get a salary of $201,000, for his salary, $41,000 for retirement costs, and $24,000 for benefits. It's not clear if the "benefits" include Felz's $625.00 per month car allowance. Felz currently earns $166,250 per year.
Felz is the most approachable and humble city manager I have met but does that mean we should be giving him a MASSIVE raise in the midst of multiple crises?
Let’s recap.
We have an $8-million budget deficit which city staff says will be shored up through employee contract negotiation. At this rate, are deficit will GROW, not shrink. It's not fair to ask other city employees to take huge pay cuts while the top dog gets a big raise.
And then there is the most recent debacle, the complete mishandling of the death of Kelly Thomas at the hands of City employees. Who knows how much this will cost Fullerton taxpayers...
I’m all for giving our new city manager time to right these many wrongs but I think pay should be based on actual performance and not intentions or platitudes.
Dear Joe, If you want a raise, close the budget deficit, end the illegal “franchise tax” on water, end the practice of misappropriating public funds, and put a stop to police corruption.
You know the timing couldn't be worse and think about how this will reflect on the City of Fullerton. Please do the right thing and reject the raise.
Here Here Greg.. Mr. Felz is a tool for 3 of the City Council, Bankhead, McKinley and Jones..
ReplyDeleteActually, ALL of the department heads could be considered "tools" for the ruling class. In Fullerton the ruling class are the three under threat of recall.
ReplyDeleteAs I recall, Whitaker voted no on the budget because it contained an $8-million deficit. Quirk-Silva is often the lone dissenting vote.
Like then-Mayor Don Bankhead said during the 2010 election: "If you want more of the same, vote for me." He won.