The other day I spoke with a person from North Orange County who felt compelled to share some of their personal philosophy with me on public employee unions, fat pensions, and job security. The person, we’ll call them Jo, gave me some information I would like to share with you.
Jo opted out of the California Teachers Association (CTA) when she was hired by the local school district. She decided it was worth the payroll deduction to opt out rather than feed the union beast. You see, Jo isn’t your typical CTA dues-paying teacher; she is that inspirational teacher who lives to stimulate you minds.
Jo recounted for me several instances of lazy and incompetent teachers being shuffled around to various assignments and protected by the union rather than being fired. She has told district officials that she earns too much money when considering she has, in her opinion, the best job ever. That’s the spirit of a good teacher who isn’t just simply riding the gravy train of public education.
Jo’s story is a matter of supply and demand. Here is a quality teacher inspiring children everyday to learn and grow while her peers are stagnant and hardly effective as educators. Every time there is an opening for a teacher, the district receives hundred of inquiries, resumes, and applications – for a single opening! The supply of teachers exceeds the demands of the school. When this occurs, the parties must reevaluate their respective values. Teachers should have more to offer (not necessarily advanced degrees) and schools should have less to offer (not necessarily lower salaries). This creates an equitable balance between the two parties so that the school gets the absolute best at a reasonable price. These basic principles are applicable to every job field, including providing professional land surveying services.
The economic disaster taxpayers have stepped in will soon force public employee unions to reconsider their position. The employees do not dictate who runs an agency or how it is run, although they certainly would like us to think they do. We, the People, run agencies by electing officials, who will be held accountable this November.
The apparent ineffectual leadership of our public agencies can be corrected November 2, 2010 by choosing candidates who hold the public’s trust paramount to the interests of the employees. But I have my doubts. There were several candidates who should have been tossed out with the primary election but weren’t. It seems common sense has succumbed to name recognition.