"Self-defense is a basic right, recognized by many legal systems from ancient times to the present day," wrote Justice Samuel Alito, who was joined in the majority by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. (from the OCR)
The big question on my mind is this: Is the right to keep and bear arms in the name of self-defense only a right of someone occupying a residence? What about the "houseless" (a term my brother likes to use and rightfully so)? What about business owners and workers? Do you have to have a structure in which you you live, pay rent, or own in order to defend your self with a firearm? I think not.
Based on the Court's ruling, I think the right to self-defense is not limited to the domicile but rather anywhere a person is. The only exceptions that I could foresee might include public schools and buildings such as City Hall, where there is a police presence and command of security to defend the defenseless.
The real question...when will California recognize the U.S. Constitution?
No comments:
Post a Comment